गुरुवार, 31 मार्च 2022
$-Trillionisation of State Economies
बुधवार, 30 मार्च 2022
Reflection and Expression
A distinction can be made between reflecting and expressing and should be made. If such a distinction is kept in mind, it would be helpful in improving public discourse. Mostly, people while writing or speaking in a solemn mode, try to impress others. In such endeavours, they rely mindlessly on the words of people who they perceive as greats or high-sounding phraseologies. This may be called reflection: one simply reflects without understanding or adding to the idea. They seek to bask in the reflected glory and expect others to praise the light they seemingly emanate. These do contribute to the public good, but very little, and on the flip side, these mislead. For instance, one can be reminded of this: 'The executive of the modern state is nothing but a committee for managing the common affairs of the whole bourgeoisie.'
The expression occurs when you speak your own heart and mind, you speak of your experiences: of your pain, agony, happiness, and excitement; of the treatments you get at the hands of others: good, bad, or ugly; of the realisations of what you do to others. These are vitals of life but tragically we refrain from speaking about them. An expression may be called writings and speeches which expresses you, a living being, a feeling being, a sensible being.
Yet, expressions again can be differentiated from egoistic hyperboles; those coming from persons who have the airs of personifying wisdom, and when they open their mouths, only gospel truths come out. The expression must be identified with the words of human beings, not with those of superhumans.
Niraj Kumar Jha
शनिवार, 26 मार्च 2022
Being Doctrinaire
Socialism and Welfarism
बुधवार, 23 मार्च 2022
Is there a tabula rasa?
रविवार, 20 मार्च 2022
$42-bn investment from Japan
Japan has proposed to infuse its capital to the tune of $42-bn in India. This is indeed a very welcome thing to happen for two reasons. First is the very basic thing, and that is, Japan is a friendly and democratic country. Secondly, basically, foreign capital is meant for setting up large industrial units and business operations. That is its direct benefit as it adds to the national GDP and provides employment to the scores of people. These big units also cause the mushrooming of numerous ancillary units largely set up by domestic entrepreneurs. Thus, it catalyses domestic industries and businesses to grow. Along with this direct benefit the breadth of good it does to any country is difficult to map. I mention a few of them: it means an infusion of high-end technology and knowhow, managerial and business skills, more efficient work culture on the one hand and on the other, it also means better provisions for the countrymen in terms of commodities and services, and more moolah out of exports. More generally, the intensified economic activities of scale and surpluses so created lead to the betterment of public life. A country in which foreign capital is invested on large scale is cared for by the international community too as they have a stake in the stability of the country. Capital irrespective of its origin, domestic or foreign, does other things more profoundly but unseen, and that is: it promotes rationalism and humanism in any society. Internationally, it cements differences and engages countries in cooperative relations. It is better we become more capital friendly overcoming the EIC syndrome and the Bolshevik trained psyche.
Niraj Kumar Jha