हर बात जो तुम्हें प्रभावित करती है, इस बात से छोटी है।
नीरज कुमार झा
Liberalism is a word so variously used and so often ruthlessly abused that it has turned amorphous as a conceptual category. Its essence, a human being centres the phenomenal, is lost in the din of noble-sounding ideas that many people articulate and champion to further their vested interests. Humanism was both an epistemological and political revolution. The idea can be dismissed theologically and even philosophically, but, the fact remains that the idea emerged at a historical juncture and caught the imagination of certain people. With this idea over time, human beings could claim their humanity. Those who lack civic morality and desire to lord over their fellow human beings often seek to extinguish the liberal spirit by invoking very liberalism.
Niraj Kumar Jha
A time came when imperial orders competing with each other made imperialism global. At one point, imperialism was the world, its flora and fauna, and everyone. It was a planetary hierarchical placing of people and grabbing of resources. The system globally coopted education and made it an instrument of order rather than letting it remain a passage to the humanization of human beings. A degree was meant to be a passport to a higher sphere. It was a process of the denial of humanity to human beings. The story ends here. Is it history?
Niraj Kumar Jha
जन अथवा समाज मंगल गंभीर और जनहितैषी दार्शनिकों की उपस्थिति की मांग करता है।
हालाँकि दर्शन के साथ गंभीर और जनहितैषी विशेषण अनावश्यक हैं, लेकिन दर्शन के नाम से जो चलन में रहता है, उसको लेकर सचेत करने के लिए यहाँ इन विशेषणों का प्रयोग किया गया है।
गंभीर इसलिए कि एक तथाकथित दार्शनिक हवाई किले बनाने वाला हो सकता है; बिना इतिहास बोध, समाज और मानवीय प्रकृति की समझ के वह निरर्थक स्वप्नों का द्रष्टा और प्रसारक हो सकता है। ऐसे दार्शनिक बड़ी-बड़ी बातें करते हैं और समाज अपनी तमाम विसंगतियों के साथ यथास्थिति में रहता है। किसी भी साधन-संपन्न संप्रभु देश में विपन्नता की विद्यमानता इस तरह की कुबुद्धि के आधिक्य का ही प्रमाण है।
दूसरा कि अनेक आधिकारिक विद्वान द्वारा बाह्य संस्कृति से उत्पन्न विचारधाराओं को स्वयं के परिवेश में अनुकूलन की क्षमता की बिना परख किए उसके आरोपण की पैरोकारी करते हैं। यहाँ तक कि जहाँ से उनका आयात किया गया है, वहाँ भी उसे स्वीकार नहीं किया गया हो। ऐसे विद्वानों को भी दार्शनिक की श्रेणी में रखा जाता है। विदेशीकृत विद्वान अपनी गठरी में संग्रहीत सामग्रियों को लेकर उलझन का प्रदर्शन कर भी इस श्रेणी में स्थान पा लेते हैं।
जनहितैषी इसलिए कि दर्शन संज्ञा का दुरुपयोग होता है। कोई व्यक्ति अस्तित्व के अज्ञेय पक्षों को लेकर भय और मानवीय मानसिकता में अंतर्निहित दुर्बलताओं को आधार बनाकार शब्दाडंबर अथवा भाषाई जाल के माध्यम से लोगों को भ्रमित कर सकता है। मानव इतिहास में मानव निर्मित त्रासदियों की भरमार ऐसे ही विकृत बुद्धिप्रयोगों का दुष्परिणाम रहा है।
दर्शन और विज्ञान में अंतर है। दर्शन की प्रकृति समग्रता मूलक अथवा व्यापक दृष्टि है। इस दृष्टि की व्यापकता अज्ञेय और ज्ञेय का भी मेल कराती है। इसका बिन्दु संकेन्द्रण भी व्यापक दृष्टि का ही सघन संकुचन है। यह जीवन को अर्थयुक्त बनाती है। विज्ञान प्रधानतया एकलता से व्यापकता की ओर जाता है और इसकी मूल प्रकृति संकेन्द्रण की है।
दर्शन मानव जीवन का विज्ञान की तुलना में अधिक सशक्त मार्गदर्शक है। दर्शन विज्ञान को अधिगृहीत रखता है। विज्ञान की स्थिति दर्शन सेवी की है।
यह दर्शन ही है जो मानव को बर्बर से सभ्य बनाता है, और दर्शन के अभाव में भौतिक तथा वैज्ञानिक साधनों से युक्त होते हुए भी समुदाय प्रवृत्ति और आचरण से असभ्य ही बने रहते हैं। ऐसा नहीं लगता है कि मानव बिना दर्शन के हो। वास्तव में बर्बरता प्रवृत्ति होती है, जो दर्शन की जगह काम करती है। यही प्रवृत्ति दर्शन विकृति का स्रोत और दर्शन की चुनौती है।
भारत ने दर्शन में महती योगदान दिया है। वसुधैव कुटुंबकम, सर्वमंगल, जीवन की विविध शैलियों का अभिनंदन, शांति और सुबुद्धि हेतु सतत प्रार्थना इस दर्शन की अनन्य सीखें हैं। आज भारत अपनी मौलिक मेधा को जागृत कर पुनः इस नए युग में मानवहित के पोषण में भूमिका निभाए, यह अभीष्ट है।
नीरज कुमार झा
Shri Yogiraj is a blessed human being. He sculpted the Divine to life. The eyes are more alive than those of any living human being. What he did appears pure inspiration. It is ethereal; no work of art of any earthling can match in beauty or grace.
People commanding some socially recognised position or seeing themselves on a mission invariably have a lot of artificiality in their persona. They cannot be called abnormal, but they are not normal either. Their demeanour is overbearing, and they expect people to be submissive. A person who has normal mental makeup, is self-respecting, and does not suffer from any want, actual or notional, would feel uncomfortable by their presence around and sometimes even find them unbearable.
Why do we have positions and missions occupied by such overbearing people? The basic fact is that people err in imagining and working on their coexistence. Why does such an error prevail everywhere on the populated parts of the planet though in proportion to the state of development? This may be because of the genetic coding of human beings. We have lived for a far longer duration of our existence in jungles where bare survival was an act of extreme heroism. Extraordinariness which was once a survival need remains a human goal. People devise extraordinary positions and roles for themselves, which in turn necessitate extraordinariness in human beings to play those roles. Precarious conditions and human consciousness together disconcert human agency.
Niraj Kumar Jha
More mutual goodwill and respect are highly desirable. What causes the hugeness of desirability? The reason is that a person does not value themselves. Many would not accept this as a fact. They would see people highly valuing themselves, but these people value their assumed positions, real or make-believe, not their persons. Arrogance and self-respect look similar but are essentially different. A self-respecting person would be unfailingly respectful to fellow people.
This desirability does not emanate from something natural. Most of it is rooted in history where enslaver regimes through ruthless coercion denied any dignity to their subjects. Such people are now DNAed to hate each other and always love some high office to dictate their lives. Mandating collectivism has a history in the background.
Niraj Kumar Jha
Generally known and accepted fact is that the single factor most critical for progress is the freedom of expression. What gave the West an edge over the rest of the world and enabled them to colonise a large part of the globe was that they had this freedom, at least in the elite circles. They had clarity of vision and thereby winning strategy.
Freedom of expression is not a commodity given or taken, held or snatched. Its abuses may erode it, and good uses may enhance it. One must choose to speak and care to speak with clarity, knowledge, logic, honesty and tact. The elements of honesty and tact may sound incongruent, but honest purposes sometimes need, on occasion, some tact to make it work.
Having a right to freedom of expression bestows on one the duty to promote this freedom. Speaking honestly, truthfully, politely and with civility helps, At the same time, one must strive to improve how they speak by enriching their knowledge and, thereby, cultivating open-mindedness.
Niraj Kumar Jha
पौष शुक्ल पक्ष १२, २०८०
अयोध्या में आज कालातीत एवं कालिक के संगम का सत्यम, शिवम, सुंदरम के मूर्त रूप में जीवंत होना पौष शुक्ल पक्ष - १२, २०८० को विलक्षण दिवस बनाता है। यह सम्पूर्ण मानवता के अपूर्व मंगल का युगारंभ है। प्रभु और भारत के चिरंतन सम्राट श्रीराम के प्रति समर्पण और निष्ठा की अनुभूति आज हर भक्त की पूर्णता है।
यह दिवस भक्ति और धर्म, अलौकिक प्रज्ञा और लौकिक विवेक, आस्था और सौहार्द, सौन्दर्य और सुगमता, एवं ऐश्वर्य और कल्याण की एकरूपता के उत्सव तथा तदनुरूप नवजीवन के उद्गम का कालखंड है।
यह दिवस भारतीयों को भ्रम और भटकाव से दूर होने की प्रेरणा देता है। भारतीय अपने विवेक, उद्यम और शौर्य से संस्कारयुक्त संपन्नता के नए-नए कीर्तिमान रचेंगे, यही आज से भविष्य है।
सियावर रामचन्द्र जी की जय।
नीरज कुमार झा
It is rare to see a person who is totally free of egoism. Those who are so are mostly indifferent. But we know and sometimes come to see people who do not impose themselves on others, create an ambience of bonhomie and walk with their companions with the spirit of collective well-being. What makes them the finest of human beings and makes them shine and light up others without being either egoist or indifferent. This is soulfulness, which survives among some despite our education and social milieu. Our education basically instils egoism in us and divides us between those who are arrogant and those who are frustrated.
Niraj Kumar Jha
Based on the relationship between scholars and knowledge, one may classify scholars into two categories. The first category of scholars views the discipline of their engagement as sacrosanct and seeks to propagate whatever they decipher from their learning for the observance by whom they address. They see themselves as subjects of the discipline and work with a sense of devotion to the fashionable precepts of their respective disciplines. These are devout scholars.
The other or second category of scholars are those who master their respective disciplines. Their approach to the discipline is secular and utilitarian. Instead of being driven by knowledge, they use knowledge for the common good, including their own good.
The first categories of scholars are necessarily products of societies which have disturbed or ruptured histories yet to be overcome. Their collective vision is split, and they do not have a coherent perspective of what they view or review. They also lack in their efforts for the reason of the absence of sufficient motivation to know the ins and outs of the body of knowledge they engage with as they face mostly a demeaning milieu. For them, there always remains something mysterious in the body of knowledge they encounter mostly as a result of their incompetence. This incites a devotion in their minds instead of challenging their reason. Underdevelopment is a matter of the lack of seriousness in scholarly vocations.
Niraj Kumar Jha
भक्ति
Serving each other, not cheating, robbing, and fleecing others, is the prime inclination of civil people. Barbarism relies on violence and craft, and barbaric people seek to enslave and despoil each other and anyone. The market is the mechanism through which one serves the rest. Democracy flows from this natural tendency of civilized people. Liberalism is the coin of which capitalism and democracy are two sides. Liberalism is the highest stage of civilizational evolution so far.
I have used the term civilization here not in the sense of the racial-religious geographic regions of the world but in terms of the distance any individual has travelled away from their barbaric primality both historically and psychologically.
What drags the civilizational march of humanity backwards is their primal instincts DNAed in them by their far longer existence in the wild. The herd mentality, natural to the primal human folks for surviving in the jungle, undyingly informs human thoughts and leads to the production of collectivist ideologies, ironically, even through scientific methods.
Liberalism in the last quarter of the twentieth century reemerged to be the default protocol for humankind as being the logical way to human good. The dismantling of the Berlin Wall was the most momentous occasion of the civilizational advance when ordinary people ripped the mighty menacing wall to rubble with their bare hands.
We should avoid being the generation that would lose the legacy of the sagacity and sacrifices of the people who suffered and fought against the most barbaric regimes and orders ravaging humanity in the last century.
Niraj Kumar Jha